Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Vol. 145 No. 2728 (2015)

Biomedical informatics in Switzerland: need for action

  • Christian Lovis
  • Jürg Blaser
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14173
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14173
Published
29.06.2015

Summary

Biomedical informatics (BMI) is an umbrella scientific field that covers many domains, as defined several years ago by the International Medical Informatics Association and the American Medical Informatics Association, two leading players in the field. For example, one of the domains of BMI is clinical informatics, which has been formally recognised as a medical subspecialty by the American Board of Medical Specialty since 2011. Most OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries offer very strong curricula in the field of BMI, strong research and development funding with clear tracks and, for most of them, inclusion of BMI in the curricula of health professionals, but BMI remains only marginally recognised in Switzerland. Recent major changes, however, such as the future federal law on electronic patient records, the personalised health initiative or the growing empowerment of citizens towards their health data, are adding much weight to the need for BMI capacity-building in Switzerland.

References

  1. Definition of Biomedical Informatics [Internet]. American Medical Informatics Association. [accessed 2015 Feb 26]. Available from: http://www.amia.org/presentation/definition-biomedical-informatics
  2. Kulikowski CA, Shortliffe EH, Currie LM, Elkin PL, Hunter LE, Johnson TR, et al. AMIA Board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):931–8.
  3. Presentation about Biomedical Informatics [Internet]. American Medical Informatics Association. [accessed 2015 Feb 19]. Available from: http://www.amia.org/sites/amia.org/files/AMIA-definition-of-Biomedical-Informatics-update.ppt
  4. Schneeweiss S. Learning from big health care data. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(23):2161–3.
  5. Martin-Sanchez F, Verspoor K. Big data in medicine is driving big changes. Yearb Med Inform. 2014;9(1):14–20.
  6. Koutkias V, Thiessard F. Big data – smart health strategies. Findings from the yearbook 2014 special theme. Yearb Med Inform. 2014;9(1):48–51.
  7. Miriovsky BJ, Shulman LN, Abernethy AP. Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(34):4243–8.
  8. MeSH Browser [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). [accessed 2015 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68008490 MeSH Unique ID: D008490
  9. Vision paper “eHealth 2025” from the Swiss Society for Medical Informatics [Internet]. E-Health Suisse. Coordination Office Confederation-Cantons for ehealth in Switzerland. [accessed 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.e-health-suisse.ch/grundlagen/00086/index.html?lang=de
  10. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2526–34.
  11. Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(1):48–54.
  12. Vermeulen KM, van Doormaal JE, Zaal RJ, Mol PGM, Lenderink AW, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Kosterink JGW, van den Bemt PMLA. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients. Int J Med Inf. 2014;83(8):572–80.
  13. Radley DC, Wasserman MR, Olsho LE, Shoemaker SJ, Spranca MD, Bradshaw B. Reduction in medication errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(3):470–6.
  14. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Kuperman GJ, Blumenfeld B, Recklet EG, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2006;13(1):5–11.
  15. US Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board [Internet]. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. [accessed 2015 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx
  16. Classen DC, Bates DW. Finding the meaning in meaningful use. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(9):855–8.
  17. Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Programs [Internet]. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. [accessed 2015 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/EHRIncentivePrograms
  18. Medicare/Medicaid EHR Incentive and Penalty Programs [Internet]. American Medical Association (AMA). [accessed 2015 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/advocacy/topics/digital-health/medicare-medicaid-incentive-programs.page
  19. Certified health IT product list [Internet]. The Office of the National Coordinator for health Information technology. [accessed 2015 Feb 3]. Available from: http://oncchpl.force.com
  20. Re-examining the strategies needed to successfully adopt health IT [Internet]. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). [accessed 2015 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.amia.org/sites/amia.org/files/EHR-White-Paper.pdf
  21. Entwurf des Bundesgesetzes über das elektronische Patientendossier [Internet]. Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). [accessed 2014 Nov 26]. Available from: http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/gesundheitspolitik/10357/10360/index.html?lang=en