Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 140 No. 3940 (2010)

Career paths in physicians’ postgraduate training – an eight-year follow-up study

  • Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer
  • Martina Stamm
  • Richard Klaghofer
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2010.13056
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010;140:w13056
Published
27.09.2010

Summary

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: To date, there are hardly any studies on the choice of career path in medical school graduates. The present study aimed to investigate what career paths can be identified in the course of postgraduate training of physicians; what factors have an influence on the choice of a career path; and in what way the career paths are correlated with career-related factors as well as with work-life balance aspirations.

METHODS: The data reported originates from five questionnaire surveys of the prospective SwissMedCareer Study, beginning in 2001 (T1, last year of medical school). The study sample consisted of 358 physicians (197 females, 55%; 161 males, 45%) participating at each assessment from T2 (2003, first year of residency) to T5 (2009, seventh year of residency), answering the question: What career do you aspire to have? Furthermore, personal characteristics, chosen specialty, career motivation, mentoring experience, work-life balance as well as workload, career success and career satisfaction were assessed. Career paths were analysed with cluster analysis, and differences between clusters analysed with multivariate methods.

RESULTS: The cluster analysis revealed four career clusters which discriminated distinctly between each other: (1) career in practice, (2) hospital career, (3) academic career, and (4) changing career goal. From T3 (third year of residency) to T5, respondents in Cluster 1–3 were rather stable in terms of their career path aspirations, while those assigned to Cluster 4 showed a high fluctuation in their career plans. Physicians in Cluster 1 showed high values in extraprofessional concerns and often consider part-time work. Cluster 2 and 3 were characterised by high instrumentality, intrinsic and extrinsic career motivation, career orientation and high career success. No cluster differences were seen in career satisfaction. In Cluster 1 and 4, females were overrepresented.

CONCLUSION: Trainees should be supported to stay on the career path that best suits his/her personal and professional profile. Attention should be paid to the subgroup of physicians in Cluster 4 switching from one to another career goal in the course of their postgraduate training.

References

  1. Chervenak F, McCullough L, Cefalo R. An ethical justification and policy for making commitments during computerized residency application processes: The US matching program as a laboratory for needed reform. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;10.1007/s10459-009-9167-1.
  2. Jefferies T. Selection for specialist training: what can we learn from other countries? BMJ. 2007;334:1302–4.
  3. Delamothe. Centralised application services for specialist training. BMJ. 2007;334:1285–6.
  4. Gjerberg E. Gender differences in doctors’ preference – and gender differences in final specialisation. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:591–605.
  5. Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. The influence of controllable lifestyle and sex on the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students, 1996–2003. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):791–6.
  6. British Medical Association: BMA Cohort Study of 1995 Medical Graduates. London: British Medical Association, Health Policy & Economic Research Unit; 2005.
  7. Newton DA, Grayson MS, Foster Thompson L. The variable influence of lifestyle and income on medical students’ career choices: data from two U.S. medical schools, 1998–2004. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):809–14.
  8. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, Klaghofer R. The new generation of family physicians – career motivation, life goals and work-life balance. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138(21-22):305–12.
  9. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, Bauer G, Hämmig O, Knecht M, Klaghofer R. The impact of gender and parenthood on physicians’ careers – professional and personal situation seven years after graduation. BMC Health Serv Res. 201;10(40).
  10. Alfermann D, Reigber D, Turan J. Androgynie, soziale Einstellungen und psychische Gesundheit: Zwei Untersuchungen an Frauen im Zeitvergleich. In Androgynie Vielfalt und Möglichkeiten. Eds. Bock U, Alfermann D. Stuttgart: Metzler; 1999:142–55.
  11. Abele AE, Stief M, Andrä MS. Zur ökonomischen Erfassung beruflicher Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen – Neukonstruktion einer BSW-Skala. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 2000;44:145–51.
  12. Abele AE: Karriereorientierungen angehender Akademikerinnen und Akademiker. Bielefeld: Kleine; 1994.
  13. Blickle G, Kuhnert B, Rieck S. Laufbahnförderung durch Unterstützungsnetzwerk: Ein neuer Mentoringansatz und seine empirische Überprüfung. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 2003;2(3):118–28.
  14. Abele AE. Ziele, Selbstkonzept und Work-Life-Balance bei der längerfristigen Lebensgestaltung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 2005;49(4):176–86.
  15. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, Klaghofer R. Career-Success Scale – a new instrument to assess young physicians’ academic career steps. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(120).
  16. Abele A, Stief M. Selbstregulationskompetenzen und beruflicher Erfolg. In Individuelle Steuerung beruflicher Entwicklung: Kernkompetenzen in der modernen Arbeitswelt. Ed. Wiese B. Frankfurt: Campus; 2004:61–89.
  17. Bacher J, Wenzig K, Vogler M. SPSS TwoStep Cluster – A First Evaluation. In Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere 2004-2. Erlangen-Nürnberg: Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; 2004.
  18. Bacher J. Clusteranalyse. Anwendungsorientierte Einführung. München: Oldenbourg; 2002.
  19. Jones L, Fisher T. Workforce trend in general practice in the UK: results from a longitudinal study of doctors’ careers. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:134–6.
  20. British Medical Association: The Cohort Study of 2006 Medical Graduates. Ed. British Medical Association Health Policy & Economic Research Unit. London: British Medical Association; 2009.
  21. Reichenbach L, Brown H. Gender and academic medicine: impact on the health workforce. BMJ. 2004;329:792–5.
  22. Bowles A, Kevorkian C, Rintala D. Gender differences regarding career issues and promotion in academic physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:918–25.
  23. Berweger S, Keller C. Prädiktoren der akademischen Laufbahnintention. Ergebnisse einer geschlechtervergleichenden Befragung von Doktorandinnen und Doktoranden auf dem Hintergrund der sozial-kognitiven Laufbahntheorie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2005;19(3):145–58.
  24. Gjerberg E. Women doctors in Norway: the challenging balance between career and family life. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(7):1327–41.
  25. Heiligers PJM, Hingstman L. Career preferences and the work-family balance in medicine: gender differences among medical specialists. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1235–46.
  26. French F, Andrew J, Awramenko M, Coutts H, Leighton-Beck L, Mollison J, et al. Why do work patterns differ between men and women GPs? J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(2-3):163–72.
  27. Allen I. Women doctors and their careers: what now? BMJ. 2005;331:369–72.
  28. Abele AE. Gender gaps in early career development of university graduates. Why are women less successful than men? Eur Bull Soc Psychol. 2000;12(3):22–37.
  29. Hoff E-H, Grote S, Hohner H-U, Dettmer S. Berufsverlaufsmuster und Geschlecht in Medizin und Psychologie. Z Politische Psychologie. 2000;8:203–23.
  30. Hohner H-U, Grote S, Hoff E-H. Geschlechtsspezifische Berufsverläufe. Unterschiede auf dem Weg nach oben. Dtsch Ärztebl. 2003;100(4):A 166–9.
  31. Reed V, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview. Med Educ. 2001;35(2):139–47.
  32. Johnson C, Johnson B, Liese B. Dual-doctor marriages: career development. Fam Med. 1992;24(3):205–8.
  33. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C. Academic career in medicine – requirements and conditions for successful advancement in Switzerland BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(70).
  34. Seibert S, Crant J, Kraimer M. Proactive personality and career success. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(3):416–27.
  35. Lambert EM, Holmboe ES. The relationship between specialty choice and gender of U.S. medical students, 1990–2003. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):797–802.
  36. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. Mentoring in Academic Medicine. JAMA. 2006;296:1103–15.
  37. Bussey-Jones J, Bernstein L, Higgins S, Malebranche D, Paranjape A, Genao I, et al. Repaving the road to academic success: the IMeRGE approach to peer mentoring. Acad Med. 2006;81(7):674–9.
  38. Wasserstein A, Quistberg D, Shea J. Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania: Results of a faculty survey. Society Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:210–4.
  39. Leigh J, Tancredi D, Kravitz R. Physician career satisfaction within specialties. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(166).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>